|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
|
|
|
+## 1. Since the current Lead was hired, how many weekly reports were created? What, in general, did each report contain?
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+role of the lead of operations wg was opened 05.06.2021 (link https://testnet.joystream.org/#/working-groups/opportunities/operationsGroup/1)
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+current OWG lead (l1dev) was hired on this role 06.062021 (link https://discord.com/channels/811216481340751934/812344874099277824/850960214509223986)
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+first report was made 28.10.2021 and contained information about rounds from 7 to 27:
|
|
|
+- proposal https://pioneer.joystreamstats.live/#/proposals/744.
|
|
|
+- PR https://github.com/Joystream/community-repo/pull/442
|
|
|
+- file https://github.com/Joystream/community-repo/blob/8fa88059093f6be303ec1c224dc14f27ce92ef9c/working-groups/operations-group/README.md
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+then there were 3 reports:
|
|
|
+- round 28 (4.11.2021) https://pioneer.joystreamstats.live/#/proposals/771
|
|
|
+- round 29 (9.11.2021) https://pioneer.joystreamstats.live/#/proposals/791
|
|
|
+- rounds 30 + 31 (24.11.2021) https://pioneer.joystreamstats.live/#/proposals/844
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+each report contains the following information:
|
|
|
+- the number of the round
|
|
|
+- date of the round
|
|
|
+- spent amount (in $ and tJOY)
|
|
|
+- balance (in $ and tJOY)
|
|
|
+- number of operations workers at the beginning and in the end of the round and % change
|
|
|
+- total Operations Stake (workers + lead) t the beginning and in the end of the round and % change
|
|
|
+- list of WG members, their status, salary (tJOY/block, M tJOY/term, and total M tJOY)
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+some reports contains additional information, such as:
|
|
|
+- budgets links
|
|
|
+- specific tasks that have been made and paid and proposal links
|
|
|
+- links to proposals which asks to increase OWG budgets
|
|
|
+- links to operations tasks
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+## 2. Since the current Lead was hired, how many workers were hired and fired? If anyone was fired, what was the stated reason(s)?
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+### hired members:
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+round 7 - 1 hired member:
|
|
|
+1. l1dev
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+round 10 - 3 hired members:
|
|
|
+1. isonar
|
|
|
+2. nexusfallout
|
|
|
+3. freakstatic
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+round 11 - 4 hired members:
|
|
|
+1. stwoof
|
|
|
+2. maxlevush
|
|
|
+3. drmarkovi
|
|
|
+4. dapplooker
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+round 14 - 1 hired member:
|
|
|
+1. lkskrn
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+round 15 - 2 hired members:
|
|
|
+1. shtihmas
|
|
|
+2. palladium
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+round 18 - 1 hired member:
|
|
|
+1. joystreamstats
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+round 22 - 18 hired members:
|
|
|
+1. isonar (second time because of technical questions)
|
|
|
+2. arseniy2706
|
|
|
+3. mmsaww
|
|
|
+4. shtihmas
|
|
|
+5. chiffah
|
|
|
+6. zazik
|
|
|
+7. chasil
|
|
|
+8. mmsaww (second time because of technical questions)
|
|
|
+9. goldmember
|
|
|
+10. metralunab
|
|
|
+11. ilich
|
|
|
+12. kate_fm
|
|
|
+13. ururu
|
|
|
+14. andybut
|
|
|
+15. kriptos
|
|
|
+16. chiffah (second time because of technical questions)
|
|
|
+17. surpaul
|
|
|
+18. allyes
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+round 27 - 1 hired member:
|
|
|
+1. whitebarbie
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+total members hired: 31
|
|
|
+without lead: 30
|
|
|
+without reruns (3 people are written two times because of technical questions): 27
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+### fired members
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+round 16 - 5 fired members:
|
|
|
+1. stwoof
|
|
|
+2. maxlevush
|
|
|
+3. drmarkovi
|
|
|
+4. shtihmas
|
|
|
+5. palladium
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+round 17 - 1 fired member:
|
|
|
+1. nexusfallout
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+round 30 - 9 fired members:
|
|
|
+1. isonar 2 (he was fired two times because of technical questions, then he was fired from the second role, but still works in OWG)
|
|
|
+2. mmsaww
|
|
|
+3. mmsaww (he was fired two times because of technical questions, then he was fired from the both roles)
|
|
|
+4. chiffah (he was fired two times because of technical questions, then he was fired from the second role, but still works in OWG)
|
|
|
+5. chasil
|
|
|
+6. metralunab
|
|
|
+7. kriptos
|
|
|
+8. surpaul
|
|
|
+9. allyes
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+total members fired: 15
|
|
|
+without reruns (3 people are written two times because of technical questions): 12
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+as for the reasons of firing, there is no information about it in the reports. but i asked current lead about it. his answer: “the reason was simply that i got no response and thought they are no longer interested. everyone who got fired can message me and will create a new opening.”
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+## 3. What was the overall spending (in both tJOY and USD) at the start of every Council Term starting from the week before the Lead was hired, until now?
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+i can’t grade overall spending in OWG before hiring a current lead just because he was the first member of the group and the only lead of this group. so all spending were under the direction of the current lead.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+| round number | spent (M tJOY) | spent ($) |
|
|
|
+|--------------|----------------|-----------|
|
|
|
+| 7 | 0,3 | 11,37 |
|
|
|
+| 8 | 0,9 | 33,525 |
|
|
|
+| 9 | 0,9 | 32,4 |
|
|
|
+| 10 | 1,8 | 63,72 |
|
|
|
+| 11 | 3,3 | 114,84 |
|
|
|
+| 12 | 3,9 | 131,82 |
|
|
|
+| 13 | 6,7 | 225,79 |
|
|
|
+| 14 | 12,2 | 414,8 |
|
|
|
+| 15 | 11,3 | 358,21 |
|
|
|
+| 16 | 18,8 | 543,32 |
|
|
|
+| 17 | 17,5 | 537,25 |
|
|
|
+| 18 | 9,1 | 276,64 |
|
|
|
+| 19 | 11,7 | 240,435 |
|
|
|
+| 20 | 10 | 263 |
|
|
|
+| 21 | 8,2 | 192,946 |
|
|
|
+| 22 | 11,5 | 285,2 |
|
|
|
+| 23 | 11,1 | 280,83 |
|
|
|
+| 24 | 5 | 127 |
|
|
|
+| 25 | 9,5 | 257,45 |
|
|
|
+| 26 | 10,8 | 279,72 |
|
|
|
+| 27 | 14,5 | 374,1 |
|
|
|
+| 28 | 7 | 180,6 |
|
|
|
+| 29 | 24,1 | 554,3 |
|
|
|
+| 30 | 13,1 | 326,19 |
|
|
|
+| 31 | 10,3 | 302,305 |
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+## 4. Is the Operations handling their "basic" workload as defined in the helpdesk repo?
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+i think yes. lead answered me that the main focus of the group now - to improve jsstats and the bots we use, among other things. he also asked me if weekly reports should contain information about workers activities. i said yes!
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+now it’s difficult to see operations work and understand what they are doing. but including such information in weekly report will make group work more visible.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+i also believe that this group is very important and powerful, but they need to do something with the budget. he is too low, but council members don’t see it: they only see that OWG is the most expensive group and may think that they should reduce their budget. but the true is that this group makes a lot for the project. yes, it needs lots of money because there are good developers. so my goal for now - to create some system which will help to make their work clear for others.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
mochet