|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
|
|
|
+# Performance of Storage Lead `4-Nexusfallout`
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+## Provided Reports
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+| Links | File on Github | Proposal | Pull Request | Date | Note |
|
|
|
+|-----------------|----------------|----------|--------------|------|-----|
|
|
|
+| [Report 5](https://testnet.joystream.org/#/forum/threads/395?replyIdx=7) | - | - | - | 27 June 2021 | On-chain forum |
|
|
|
+| [Report 6](https://testnet.joystream.org/#/forum/threads/395?replyIdx=8) | [report-6.md](https://github.com/Joystream/community-repo/blob/master/workinggroup-reports/storage_group/report-6.md) | [Proposal 234](https://testnet.joystream.org/#/proposals/234) | [PR 221](https://github.com/Joystream/community-repo/pull/221) | 04 July 2021 | Merged and approved |
|
|
|
+| [Report 7](https://testnet.joystream.org/#/forum/threads/395?replyIdx=9) | [report-7.md](https://github.com/Joystream/community-repo/blob/master/workinggroup-reports/storage_group/report-7.md) | [Proposal 257](https://testnet.joystream.org/#/proposals/257) | [PR 230](https://github.com/Joystream/community-repo/pull/230) | 11 July 2021 | Merged and approved |
|
|
|
+| [Report 8](https://testnet.joystream.org/#/forum/threads/395?replyIdx=10) | [report-8.md](https://github.com/Joystream/community-repo/blob/master/workinggroup-reports/storage_group/report-8.md) | [Proposal 294](https://testnet.joystream.org/#/proposals/294) | [PR 243](https://github.com/Joystream/community-repo/pull/243 ) | 18 July 2021 | Merged and approved |
|
|
|
+| [Report 9](https://testnet.joystream.org/#/forum/threads/395?replyIdx=11) | [report-9.md](https://github.com/Joystream/community-repo/blob/master/workinggroup-reports/storage_group/report-9.md) | [Proposal 320](https://testnet.joystream.org/#/proposals/320) | [PR 260](https://github.com/Joystream/community-repo/pull/260) | 25 July 2021 | Merged and approved |
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+## Summary
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Storage Lead `4-Nexusfallout`
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+### Note
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+1. All reports have been approved by council via `text proposal`
|
|
|
+2. According to [Reporting Requirements](https://github.com/Joystream/community-repo/blob/master/rules/Storage_WG_Lead-Report_and_Tasks.md#how-to-submit-a-report) `Nexusfallout` must submit weekly reports to the `community-repo` repository via `Pull Request`. Done.
|
|
|
+4. Report 5 not provided on Github
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+### Compare with [Storage WG Lead - Tasks + Reporting Requirements](https://github.com/Joystream/community-repo/blob/master/rules/Storage_WG_Lead-Report_and_Tasks.md)
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+1. Frequency - 1 week. Done
|
|
|
+2. Put reports to the ``Community-repo`` repository. Done. Folder [here](https://github.com/Joystream/community-repo/tree/master/workinggroup-reports/storage_group)
|
|
|
+3. Create `text proposal` for approve by the council. Done
|
|
|
+4. ``A full breakdown of system specs for each storage provider`` - Started doing with report 9
|
|
|
+5. ``Bandwidth use on each provider`` - not provided
|
|
|
+6. ``Periodic upload tests`` - Made but by @tomato's and @l1dev's hands. Not provided in reports
|
|
|
+7. ``Helios Output`` - Done
|
|
|
+8. ``Free space of each one of the storage workers`` - Done
|
|
|
+9. Set reawards for Storage Providers - Done
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+### Compare with [Helpdesk](https://github.com/Joystream/helpdesk/tree/master/roles/storage-lead)
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- Storage Lead
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+1. Available on Discord - Done
|
|
|
+2. Hire/fire/warn storage workers - Done
|
|
|
+3. Manage Storage Workers - Done
|
|
|
+4. Replenished Storage Working Group Mint
|
|
|
+5. Set Vouchers Limits - Done. Submissions on Discord and [here](https://testnet.joystream.org/#/forum/threads/423)
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- Storage Workers
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+1. All storage providers have installed nodes
|
|
|
+2. The update process is underway
|
|
|
+3. Once a week, Storage Providers provide ``df -h``
|
|
|
+4. Do ``ipfs stats repo`` by request
|
|
|
+5. Do ``ipfs config Datastore.StorageMax "XXXGB"`` by request
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+### Performance for the Lead
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- At least 95% of the work he did
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+### Performance for the Workers
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+*Referring to the reports, it is impossible to understand how effective the Providers are. We still don't have tools for it. But our Stellar line-up ``@tomato``, ``@nexusfallout``, ``@freakstatic`` and ``@l1dev`` are trying to find the way every day*
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- `joystreamstats`
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- `julysake`
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- `0x2bc`
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- `kalpakci`
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- `seainvestor`
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- `maxlevush`
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- `joyval`
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- `dapplooker`
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+- `godshunter`
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+### Suggestion for the path forward
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+According to [WG Lead Term Limits](https://github.com/Joystream/community-repo/blob/master/rules/WG_Lead_Term_Limits.md) Lead's term soon ends.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+`4-Nexusfallout` showed great efficiency. We would like to continue working with him. But more worthy candidates should try the role. The Council will decide the further fate of Storage Lead referring to the results of the applications.
|
mochet