|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
|
|
|
+# KPI Community feedback:
|
|
|
+The closer we get to the launch date of the main Joystream network,the more important the role of community members in its management should become.
|
|
|
+In this regard, it is imperative to continually receive a summary of the issues and requests of the platform at specific points in time.
|
|
|
+The existing forum system with its discussions and suggestions is undoubtedly such.However, it lacks a system of analytical reporting,
|
|
|
+which,in my opinion, could form an objective understanding of the current state of affairs and problems on the platform by the council
|
|
|
+and the community as a whole.
|
|
|
+The work on this kpi will be to some extent routine, and to some extent creative.
|
|
|
+### Objective:
|
|
|
+Creating a two weeks report describing the main current problems of the platform according to the community at the moment and for the near future.
|
|
|
+### Scope of work:
|
|
|
+:white_check_mark:-conduct a survey of as many community members as possible in order to identify what they consider to be the most pressing problems at the moment.
|
|
|
+IMPORTANT: for the formation of truly objective information report, the problem expressed by the participant should not just be voiced,
|
|
|
+but also justified by at least one point!
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+:white_check_mark:-form a concise table of the survey (participant/problem/reasoning/link/topic)
|
|
|
+| № | Participant/ Handle | Problem | Reasoning | Topic | Discussion link |
|
|
|
+| - | ------------------- | -------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
|
|
|
+| 1 | marat\_mu | lack of a system of likes in the Atlas | \-The system of likes will allow BM to more objectively evaluate videos submitted in competitions<br>\-Likes will also be feedback for content creators | Atlas improving | [https://discord.com/channels/811216481340751934/812343783504085062/895731036330266654](https://discord.com/channels/811216481340751934/812343783504085062/895731036330266654) |
|
|
|
+| 2 | | | | | |
|
|
|
+| 3 | | | | | |
|
|
|
+| 4 | | | | |
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+:white_check_mark:-based on the information collected, create your own creative analysis of the current state of affairs and possible solutions to these problems
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+*Notes: At the request of the consul who took the work on the data kpay, work with the table can be replaced with the creation of an interactive survey*
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+### Distribution of rewards:
|
|
|
+I propose to take as the basis of the award in the amount of $ 100.
|
|
|
+However, due to the fact that this work can get a strong difference in the number of surveyed community members,
|
|
|
+which will directly affect the objectivity of the report, I propose to introduce a correlation of payment for this kpai depending on the number of surveyed participants.
|
|
|
+The more participants the consul can interview, the better report he will provide and therefore the higher payment he should receive!
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+### Report:
|
|
|
+In the report, provide
|
|
|
+- link to your survey table
|
|
|
+- analytical report document
|
|
|
+- short descreption with place of surveys(TG,Pioneer,Discord,etc) and a number of participants.
|
Laura Kharkevych