Kaynağa Gözat

Merge pull request #267 from traumschule/storage-okr

Storage OKR
mochet 3 yıl önce
ebeveyn
işleme
fd2cfaa6c0
1 değiştirilmiş dosya ile 37 ekleme ve 0 silme
  1. 37 0
      rules/Storage_WG_OKR.md

+ 37 - 0
rules/Storage_WG_OKR.md

@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+# Storage working group [Objectives and Key Results](https://www.whatmatters.com/faqs/okr-examples-and-how-to-write-them) 
+
+Main quality criteria for Storage Providers:
+- Speed
+- Capacity
+- Reliability
+- Geographic Location
+- Resilience
+
+## Speed
+
+The Lead has to 
+- KR1 set targets and reevaluate success criteria to grade providers (eg. A-F) based on up/download speed and latency.
+- KR2 score active providers and applicants and publish their specs and maintenance contact.
+- KR3 publish targets and let the council approve.
+The council oversees measurements and delegates the improvement and maintenance of monitoring tools to the Operations working group.
+
+## Capacity
+
+- KR4 Storage Providers must maintain as much free space as has been uploaded during the last three months.
+- KR5 These numbers must be published by the lead in Storage Reports.
+
+## Reliability
+
+- KR6 Offline providers need to be replaced by the Lead.
+- KR7 Maintainers must respond on discord within a day.
+
+## Location
+
+- KR8 To ensure good coverage for users the Lead defines preferred locations in opernings according to regional requirements set by the council.
+
+## Resilience
+
+- KR9 The Lead makes sure that enough Providers with sufficient free space are active. The number is defined by the council and KPI.
+
+## Rewards
+Lead and workers get awarded for achieving above goals. The council secretary informs the Lead about the amount once per term. If major goals are missed anyone can open a proposal to replace the Lead following the process described in [WG Lead Term Limits](https://github.com/Joystream/community-repo/blob/master/rules/WG_Lead_Term_Limits.md)).